:: Home ::  Contact Us ::

Home
Clients
Specialty
White Papers
How We Work
Success Stories
Writings
About Us
Contact Information

 

 

"IT Buyers Learned Their Lesson", by Isaac Cheifetz, Minneapolis Star Tribune, February 9, 2004

Will corporate IT spending come roaring back now that the economy is growing again? Probably not. Technology continues to become commoditized, and many corporate buyers have learned a critical lesson about how to buy and use technology.

Metaphorically, they are choosing the right car for their journey.

A Business Week article this week titled "Less Bounce in This Tech Rebound" quotes Steven Minton, director of the worldwide IT market research group at tech tracker IDC in Framingham, Mass.: "We could have a very short-term return to previous growth if the economy really booms, but after that, we think that IT spending will settle around the 7 to 8 percent growth range."

Minton's group predicts that world business IT spending, including services, hardware and software, will grow 5 percent in 2004, from $874 billion to $915 billion and "unlike in past tech binges, that rate of increase would correspond more or less with U.S. and global economic growth," the magazine said.

The allure of investing in new technologies continues to tempt executives, of course. For those fearful of change in their marketplace, new technologies hold the promise of leading a company into the future; for those enamored with being on the leading edge, the temptation to be an early adaptor is powerful; for those seeking to radically reengineer a company's internal performance, technology holds the promise of speeding the pace of change.

But corporate executives are becoming more sophisticated about buying technology. ERP ,CRM and SCM are no longer buzzwords that Pied Piper vendors can toss around with abandon. (For the IT uninitiated, those acronyms usually refer to "enterprise resource planning, "customer relationship management" and "supply-chain management.")

Here is this most critical lesson: Technology doesn't improve operations; it magnifies them -- good and bad. Automating inefficient or poorly understood processes is not just ineffective -- it can actually threaten a business.

The sophisticated executive knows that technology has the impact of a race car: a skilled driver will go faster; a mediocre or unprepared driver will hit the wall faster.

So imagine you've entered a 1,000-mile rally car race, with no speed limit, driving any car you like. The race is run on rutted dirt tracks winding through small towns, forests, and country roads. It is the unpredictable real world, just like business.

Do you choose a Ferrari? It is the fastest at accelerating from 0 to 60, and it has the highest speed. But you don't know how to drive a high-performance car. At home, you drive a family sedan. So the odds you will drive the Ferrari into a ditch are pretty high.

But let's assume you own a Ferrari, and race it on weekends at a local track. You know how to handle it and won't crash it when it bucks like a horse. Still, is it the right car to race in a 1,000-mile race? Probably not. At home, you treat it like your baby, transporting it on a trailer to and from each race. The odds of it breaking down during a 1,000-mile race are high.

Do you choose a Porsche? Car and Driver, citing their racetrack tests, says you should. It is powerful and responsive.

If the race was on the Autobahn, you would jump at the chance. But this a rally race, on a variety of surfaces and driving conditions, including gravel and mud. And the Porsche is still more car than you are used to. Are you prepared for the first time it spins out in a tight turn?

What about the Subaru WRX? It's a frequent rally champion, the Swiss Army knife of cars. Will you drive the WRX to victory?

Maybe. But by now you will have realized that the best use of your time will be training to improve your driving skills and your mental and physical endurance.

The sophisticated executive knows that, in technology automation, as in any operational improvement project, you must first optimize, then automate. They are comfortable with advanced technologies and excited about their possibilities. But like a good poker player, they will fold any hand that their analysis doesn't support as a winner.

If a business process is poorly understood or poorly managed, applying technology as a solution will be unhelpful at best, and disastrous at worst. This explains why e-commerce investments have been effective only when used to automate already smoothly functioning organizations.

But what about corporate realities such as speed to market, project deadlines, and the political frustrations of reengineering long-standing workflow? Isn't there a time to simply build a state-of-the-art solution and hang on for the ride?

No. You'll still crash the car. Driving the Ferrari won't seem like a good idea when it's in a ditch, and you are hanging upside down by your seat belt.

Next time you are in a planning meeting and you find yourself seriously tempted to follow this foolhardy path, imitate Bill Murray in "Meatballs."

Get on a chair and start chanting: "It just doesn't matter! It just doesn't matter! It just doesn't matter!" Because it doesn't. Turbocharging a car with unaligned tires will make you crash faster.

Sure, you'll embarrass yourself, but you'll save your company millions.

 

 
Clients ] Specialty ] White Papers ] How We Work ] Success Stories ] Writings ] About Us ] Contact Information ]

© Copyright 2003 - Open Technologies Consulting Co.  - All Rights Reserved.