Business Forum: Do You Have the Team to Execute the Dream?
By Isaac Cheifetz
Published June 17, 2002
The aftermath of the dot-com era has seen numerous new ventures fail or not
reach expectations. People are the most important factor in the success of new
companies.
The following is a Top 10 list of common mistakes made in assembling
executive teams for technology start-ups. Unlike a David Letterman Top 10, they
are not ranked by how funny they are, but how likely they are to make investors
weep.
As you can see, nearly all these dilemmas result from leaning too far toward
creativity or too far toward management discipline in filling each executive
role. The goal is a middle ground that intertwines aggressiveness, innovation
and discipline.
1. Overly Visionary Chief Executive Officer (CEO). Yes, a new venture
requires a leader who can paint a vision of where the company is going and how
it will transform its industry. But being a successful leader requires just
enough creativity to win, yet not so much as to get lost.
Bill Russell once said of his Boston Celtics coach Red Auerbach, winner of
nine National Basketball Association championships, that he wouldn't want to go
into battle against him. Red was creative enough to figure out how to beat you,
but no more. The rest of his energy went into executing the plan.
2. Technical CEO. CEOs with a technical background can become obsessed
with having the most elegant product in the market. The reality is that
dominating companies are good at product development, and great at marketing and
sales. There are no notable exceptions to this.
3. Administrative CEO. The opposite of the Visionary CEO, most often a
senior executive from a large company who has had success managing and growing
existing businesses. In a start-up, he must create a new business, or even a new
market -- a different challenge altogether.
4. Chief Technology Officer (CTO) as Architect. The executive in
charge of designing and developing a product ought to be a superior
technologist. But above all he must be a competent executive. A brilliant
architect who is a weak manager of projects or people will leave a trail of
unfinished products and political turmoil. Instead, position this person as the
"Chief Architect" reporting to a talented (if not brilliant) vice president of
engineering.
5. Cowboy CTO. Brilliant, charismatic and undisciplined, his vision is
catnip to investors, customers and employees. A focused person of this caliber
will be wildly successful.
Unfortunately, the Cowboy uses his abilities in a shotgun manner, leaving as
much chaos as accomplishment in his wake. He is too smart to beat in an
argument, and his brilliance seems essential to the enterprise, until the day it
closes its doors.
6. Marketing Vice President as Brand Manager. The best marketers are
trained at companies such as Procter & Gamble and General Mills. They create and
promote world-class brands in commodity markets, selling their products for
twice the price of the generic competitor on the shelf below.
But while developing a brand in technology is important, it has limitations.
Complex functionality and revolutionary innovation make branding (but not sales
and marketing) somewhat less critical. Avoid the marketing executive who focuses
on creating a brand image rather than on positioning a product in a niche where
it can gain traction.
7. Vice President of Sales and a Bit of Marketing. Some successful
sales executives have little strategic marketing experience. Their idea of
marketing is attending trade shows.
But without proper positioning, a great product sold by an aggressive sales
force probably will not succeed. Hiring (and listening to) a director of
marketing can make a non-strategic vice president of sales and marketing
effective.
8. Vice President of Sales as General Manager. A successful Fortune
1000 sales executive may have had responsibility for a 60-person sales force
producing $200 million in annual revenue. But did she inherit the sales force
rather than create it? If so, building a sales function for a new company may
feel overwhelming.
9. Bookkeeping Chief Financial Officer (CFO). A new company may
attempt to save money by hiring a chief financial officer who has a tactical
background as a controller. But a bookkeeping CFO can be a liability in
negotiating with venture capitalists and investment bankers. They may leave
enormous amounts of money on the table through their inexperience and can
hamstring a successful company for years through unsophisticated financial
structuring.
10. Bored CFO. CFOs don't always have a lot to do in the early days of
a start-up, particularly if they have been hired based on previous experience
taking a company public. A strategic CFO underutilized in the product and market
development phase of a start-up can turn into a bean-counter out of frustration.
This is more of an annoyance than a crisis and can be mitigated by using her
skills across the business.